По-русски

Riverfront Façade

The Premium residential complex, designed by KPLN, has been built in the town of Pushkino, just outside Moscow, on the banks of the Serebryanka River. Its two towers reinforce the scale of the high-rise development that emerged here in the 2000s, while introducing a bolder architectural form that reads more effectively from a distance, along with a system of contrasts and design strategies responding to the site’s waterfront setting. One of the project’s distinctive features is a series of metal discs that conceal air-conditioning units while serving as an additional decorative layer.

02 July 2026
Object
mainImg
Premium is one of three residential developments designed by KPLN along the Serebryanka, where the river widens into a pond-like basin created by a dam originally built for the Yevgeny Armand & Sons textile mill, later known under the Soviet name of Serp i Molot (“Hammer and Sickle”). The “31st Quarter” complex occupies the northern end of the water, while Premium, adjacent to “Turgeneva 13”, is located at its narrower southern edge.

The scale of development along the Serebryanka – particularly on its left bank – became striking for a town of just over 100,000 residents during the early twenty-first century. By the 2010s, a succession of 20-25-story residential buildings with largely monotonous façades had appeared here. Working with comparable floor-area ratios and building heights, KPLN has instead sought to create a distinctive “riverfront façade” – an architecture that is neither incidental nor neutral, but deliberately responds to its proximity to the water. In fact, the company has developed something of a shared design language for its Serebryanka projects, combining monolithic building forms, regular façade grids, a restrained two-color palette, and a subtle yet project-specific sculptural gesture.

“Premium” housing complex
Copyright: © KPLN


Premium occupies a trapezoidal site at the intersection of Turgeneva Street and the embankment, adjoining the two towers of Turgeneva 13 to form a coherent and rhythmic first line of development along the waterfront. Across the Serebryanka lies the arboretum of the Institute of Forestry and Forest Mechanization.

“Premium” housing complex
Copyright: © KPLN


The planning principles of the two neighboring complexes are remarkably similar. Their 21-story towers are positioned as far apart as possible, marking the street intersections while creating a more generous courtyard and preserving river views for the apartments in the elongated second-row building. The towers are linked by a podium. In Premium, however, the podium takes on a more intricate, undulating form, while the towers themselves are distinguished by their concave façades and a more expressive sculptural treatment.

“Premium” housing complex. The form making
Copyright: © KPLN


“Premium” housing complex
Copyright: © KPLN


A System of Contrasts

The two towers, arranged parallel to one another, share an identical architectural composition.

Their robust base consists of a two-story podium and an enlarged double-height lobby level, unified by large-format fiber cement panels and full-height glazing. Along the concave façades, the glazing is screened by a secondary layer of vertical metal fins. On the river-facing side, these fins extend across the entire height of the base, creating a kind of architectural curtain that lends this elevation a distinctly ceremonial character. Recessed entrance portals, clad in wood-textured porcelain panels, are also located here.

“Premium” housing complex
Copyright: © KPLN


The façades of the 19 residential floors follow a regular grid. The white elevations are particularly austere, evenly divided into a matrix of windows whose mullions establish a rhythm of their own. One of the architects’ most distinctive details is the use of circular metal discs as screens concealing the air-conditioning units. Here, they reinforce the graphic quality of the black-and-white façade, acting as a counterpoint to its rectilinear pattern while also introducing a sense of movement, since the shadows they cast are never perfectly circular. Together, the discs and the short strokes of the mullions across the gridded surface evoke a coded language – whether Morse code, composed of dots and dashes, or a musical score. Depending on the angle of the light and the changing shadows, the discs may resemble whole notes or pairs of quarter notes. The composition is built around a series of carefully balanced oppositions: black and white, circle and square, line and plane.



The river-facing elevations, together with those on the opposite side, are articulated in a more complex manner. First, they are concave in profile, a gesture that responds directly to the nearby water. Rather than resembling a wave, the form suggests a riverbank shaped by flowing water and polished by the wind. These façades are clad in vertically laid panels with wood textures in varying shades – another subtle distinction from the neighboring Turgeneva 13, which employs the same material in a different configuration. The windows are more closely spaced, incorporating a narrow vertical bay, while the black discs appear more frequently, increasing the visual density and accentuating the curvature of the façade. Juxtaposed with the more rigid, structured “shell” of the white elevations, the effect is almost geological, as though the building had been cut open to reveal its inner substance. Here the associations shift away from musical notation or Morse code toward ripples spreading across the surface of water after a raindrop – or the concentric circles left by a rock skipping across the river.

“Premium” housing complex
Copyright: © KPLN


“Premium” housing complex
Copyright: © KPLN


It is on these concave façades that another series of contrasts becomes most apparent: the natural and the mechanical, the rigid and the fluid, the smooth and the textured.

  • zooming
    “Premium” housing complex
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    “Premium” housing complex
    Copyright: © KPLN


  • zooming
    “Premium” housing complex
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    “Premium” housing complex
    Copyright: © KPLN


A Terraced Riverbank

The two towers are connected by a two-story podium whose riverfront edge takes on an undulating form. On the one hand, the geometry responds to the irregular boundaries of the site; on the other, it echoes the concave façades of the towers themselves.

The podium and the lower floors of the towers accommodate a wide range of functions, providing residents with most everyday amenities on site. These include a 267-space parking garage, storage units, stroller rooms, an integrated kindergarten, a fitness center, retail premises, offices, and cafés. Above, the podium roof serves as a generous landscaped courtyard. The children’s play areas alone cover some 540 square meters.

  • zooming
    “Premium” housing complex
    Copyright: © KPLN
  • zooming
    “Premium” housing complex
    Copyright: © KPLN


KPLN also designed the landscaping of the Serebryanka embankment. A retaining wall founded on piles creates a second terrace above the riverbank, while pedestrian paths establish direct connections between the residential courtyard and the riverside promenade. The result is a layered sequence of recreational spaces. The podium also makes efficient use of the site’s topography, accommodating a level difference of approximately two meters.



As Sergey Nikeshkin, co-founder and partner of KPLN, explains, “Our priority was to create a large-scale architectural form that would be equally compelling both from street level and when viewed from across the river. The combination of concave sculptural forms with the rhythmic grid of perforated metal discs creates a memorable image that clearly distinguishes Premium within its architectural context”.

02 July 2026

Headlines now
Riverfront Façade
The Premium residential complex, designed by KPLN, has been built in the town of Pushkino, just outside Moscow, on the banks of the Serebryanka River. Its two towers reinforce the scale of the high-rise development that emerged here in the 2000s, while introducing a bolder architectural form that reads more effectively from a distance, along with a system of contrasts and design strategies responding to the site’s waterfront setting. One of the project’s distinctive features is a series of metal discs that conceal air-conditioning units while serving as an additional decorative layer.
A Construction Set for Adult Life
In the project by Atrium, the new building for Moscow’s School No. 2107, designed to accommodate 1,100 students, is above all a carefully organized system of learning and recreational spaces. On the one hand, it is complex and highly articulated; on the other, it remains intuitive, safe, and conducive to personal growth. In a sense, it serves as a model of life in the city – a place where one must communicate, make decisions, plan ahead, and find a balance between work and leisure. All of these scenarios are reflected, to varying degrees, in the building’s architecture.
Axis of Rotation
One of the installations in the Masters exhibition at Arch Moscow featured a futuristic yet entirely feasible project by Vladimir Plotkin and TPO Reserve – a tower that could be assembled from prefabricated factory-made modules. The concept even incorporates the possibility of slow rotation (!). Using the same module, one could create a residential block, a giant cantilevered “arrow”, or virtually any other configuration you could possibly think of. Let us take a closer look at the module itself.
A New Magazine and a New Ranking
The magazine Expert.Urban has only just appeared, apparently timed to coincide with Arch Moscow. It is published with the support of VEB.RF and Strelka KB. We have not yet had time to read it cover to cover, but the impression so far is that it consists of about eighty percent interviews. It also features a distinctly “Strelka-style” initiative: a ranking of the “Best Architect of Moscow in the 21st Century”. So, who came out on top? Sergey Skuratov. Yuri Grigoryan took second place, and Sergei Tchoban came third.
Oleg Shapiro: “We design life as a whole, in all of its diversity”
Wowhaus has long since outgrown its association with “urban improvement” projects alone. One of its newer directions is neo-industrialization. Another is large-scale master planning. Yet work on Gorky Park is once again underway – only now on a more systematic and far-reaching level. In this interview, we simultaneously revisit Rem Koolhaas, Strelka, and the history of attention to the “urban environment”, while also exploring what exactly Wowhaus is working on today and how the company operates – with its nine divisions and approximately 160 employees.
Red Card for Copyright
The development concept for the territory of Shinnik Stadium in Yaroslavl, prepared by PI ARENA, took second place in an open call competition. The architects proposed a unified structure combining a football arena, a hotel, and the headquarters of PSB Bank, with carefully considered usage scenarios. However, the competition was organized in such a way that the team ultimately chose to forgo the prize money in order to retain their copyright.
CinemaHologram
Not long ago, the Moscow authorities approved the project for a new House of Cinema complex by Kleinewelt Architekten. The original 1968 building could not be preserved – yet the architects managed to save its stained-glass panels, metal reliefs, and even the volumetric parameters of the structure, which will continue to house the Union of Cinematographers and cinema halls. The project’s main focal point, however, will be a residential tower. We examine its sculptural qualities and its allusions within the Moscow context.
Form as Method: TPO Reserve
At the core of the concept developed by Vladimir Plotkin and TPO Reserve lies an unconventional morphology that addresses functional challenges beyond purely formal concerns. Above all, however, it serves expressiveness and creates a rare kind of spatial and emotional experience, as becomes evident when examining the project’s key solutions. We studied it in detail, and it was all worth it. Our interpretation is that what drives this project is neither style nor even metaphor, but rather a method.
Mound of Memory
The competition proposal for a memorial complex on the Pulkovo Heights by Studio 44 will not be realized, yet it deserves attention as an intriguing example of how architecture can symbolize traumatic events and thereby contribute to their processing and integration into human experience. The architects also succeed in combining memorial and recreational functions without slipping either into excessive dramatization or oversimplification. The project develops ideas explored in two earlier competition entries that likewise remained unbuilt – the Museum of the Siege of Leningrad and the Tuchkov Buyan park. It also recalls the mound-like hill that Alexander Nikolsky embodied in the form of the now-lost stadium on Krestovsky Island.
Home Base
Working on the new building for Letovo Junior School – opened to students in autumn 2025 in the MSU Valley – the architects of UNK, following the client’s vision, subordinated both façades and interiors to the theme of “home”. Multiple variations of pitched roofs, a city skyline traced across glass balustrades, wooden textures, and a whole series of micro-spaces for retreat within public areas are all at the disposal of primary and middle school students. We take a closer look at the new school building – and at how it interprets current trends in educational environments.
Doubles Match
The architecture of the Tennis Palace built in Luzhniki Olympic Complex, designed by Arena Design Institute, was shaped by three factors: the proximity of the brutalist Druzhba Arena, the closeness of the Moskva River and the metro bridge overpass, as well as the specifics of the function – tennis courts require large spans, abundant light, yet at the same time protection from direct sunlight. The architects divided the building into several blocks, playing on contrast, which is further emphasized by the façades developed in collaboration with TPO Reserve and Vladimir Plotkin.
Microdynamics of Macroprocesses
Given the proximity of the multifunctional complex SOLOS to Sokolniki Park and to a major transport hub, Kleinewelt Architekten embedded in the design of the two high-rise towers a sense of dynamism more characteristic of natural phenomena than of man-made objects. Without the authors’ diagrams, this logic is not easy to decipher, although the eye immediately detects a pattern and tries to grasp it. It seems to us that one tower contains the impulse of a bud about to open, while the other evokes the movement of a lithospheric plate. Let us try to unravel it together.
The Space of Post-Cubism
Sergei Tchoban and Alexandra Sheiner, of Studio CHART, created for the exhibition of “post-cubist” sculpture by Beatrice Sandomirskaya – a talented and even “mainstream” artist, yet almost unknown even to art historians – a space akin to her sculptural language: solidly built, confidently stereometric, and subtly expressive. It curves, emphasizing the mass of the sculpture, envelops the viewer, and guides them from one perspective to another, from a generic “shrine” to a “Madonna”.
The Value of Open Space
For the site near the Barrikadnaya Metro Station, Sergey Skuratov developed five projects between 2020 and 2025. Two of them were ones that won the client’s invitation-only competitions. The fifth was recently selected by the Mayor of Moscow for implementation. The project is vivid and sculptural, expressive, eye-catching, and engaging – very much in line with the spirit of our time. And yet, this project is mid-rise rather than tall. In its northwestern part, near the metro and Druzhinnikovskaya Street, it shapes a comfortable urban environment. On the opposite side, it opens up, allowing sunlight into the courtyard and creating a spatial pause within the dense city fabric. How it is organized, what geometric principles underlie it, and why it takes this form – all this is explored in our article.
Coming From the Cold
The ArchBukhta Festival remains one of the few events in Russia where participants go through the entire process of creating an architectural object – from concept to construction. And they do so on the shores of Lake Baikal, in dedication to it. This year, GAFA took part and shared its experience: a local legend, a team-specific design code, friendship, as well as ice skating and endurance in freezing temperatures all contributed to gaining something more than just an award.
Symphony of Water and Brick
The Alter residential complex, designed by Stepan Liphart and built on a bend of the Okhta River, is an example of a “drawn house”: the number of original architectural details is virtually immeasurable. As a result, ribs, projections, and recesses create a picturesque silhouette even without a significant variation in height. Both composition and material respond to the proximity of the river and to the red-brick factory building dating back to the early 20th century. The project was also significantly shaped by recommendations from the city’s chief architect. More details in our article.
The Penguin House
The building with a curved façade on Brestskaya Street is one of the manifestos of Russian neomodernism of the early 2000s, a sculpture – this is how Anatoly Belov interprets it, speaking of “breaking from the modernist canon and the contextual approach”. We do not fully agree with the author, but his perspective is an interesting one.
Wave and Vertical
The premium residential complex designed by GAFA for a site in the Khoroshevsky District responds to multiple constraints – the arc of a planned roadway, the water protection zone of the Khodynka River, and insolation requirements – through inventive massing. The composition is built on the interplay of two spatial layers: an elongated perimeter block and three towers concealed behind it generate the silhouette and key viewpoints, while also adding semantic depth reinforced by the façade solutions. Another defining feature is a large private courtyard, complemented by a citywide linear park.
Office on Trubnaya
We continue publishing projects by Valery Kanyashin. A building once described, a quarter century ago, as an example of “quiet modernism” has remained just that in some people’s memory. According to Anatoly Belov, its main quality is its unobtrusiveness. The architects from Ostozhenka say the leading role here is played by context and landscape – the change in elevation. Yet is it really so inconspicuous?
The First International
With this publication, we begin a series of texts dedicated to works by the late Valery Kanyashin, one of the founders of Ostozhenka Architects. As it happens, the projects he was involved in largely illustrate our understanding of the firm and its history. The first project in this series is the International Moscow Bank on Prechistenskaya Embankment.
In Memory of Valery Kanyashin
On Friday, February 27, architect Valery Kanyashin passed away – co-founder of Ostozhenka Architects and the author of many significant buildings in Moscow. We publish a text by Anatoly Belov in memory of Valery Kanyashin.
Hypertext in Space
As part of the exhibition “What We Have We (Do Not) Keep”, Sergey Tchoban, the Museum of Architecture, and the CHART studio experiment with an eco-conscious approach to exhibition design, with thematic cross-references and even with publicistic reflections on the necessity of preserving modernism, the roots of contemporary architecture, and the birth of ideas. All of this makes the exhibition, with its light and transparent design, look quite innovative. The elements – both “material” and conceptual – are familiar, yet their combination is far from conventional.
The Outline of “Foundation”
In their competition proposal for the Fili transport hub, the consortium led by Alexey Ilyin proposed an “inhabited arch” – a form that is simple yet complex. The architects emphasize that even at the competition stage, the project’s feasibility was fully calculated, taking into account the minimal nighttime closures of Bagration Avenue. How was this achieved? With what functions? Let us take a closer look. In our view, the building would have suited the heroes of Isaac Asimov’s Foundation novels perfectly.
The Flying Horizontal
“A house in the spirit of Wright”, as architect Roman Leonidov describes it, pointing to his source of inspiration, was built on a challenging wedge-shaped site. To achieve a sense of intimacy and secure good views from the windows, the entire volume had to be shifted toward the far boundary, turning the house “back” to the neighboring mansions. The main façade demonstrates time-tested techniques often employed by the company: articulated horizontals, a weightless roofline, and a triad of materials – light plaster, dark slate, and warm wood.
Needles of Horizon Contemplation
The “House of Horizons”, designed by Kleinewelt Architekten in Krylatskoye, is carefully thought out at the stereometric level – from the logic of how the volumes interlock (and, conversely, how gaps are articulated between them) to the triangular balconies that give the building its striking, slightly bristling silhouette.
The Red Thread
A linear park project prepared by Alexey Ilyin studio for the improvement of a riverbank in one of the residential districts seeks to reconnect people with nature. Two levels of the embankment invite visitors to contemplate the landscape while at the same time protecting the riverbank from excessive human impact. The “aerial street” links functional zones and the opposite banks, creating new points of attraction along the way: balconies, bridges, and even a “grotto”.
Spindle and Thread
The concept of the Waver residential complex in Yekaterinburg draws inspiration from the past of the Parkovy district. In order to preserve the memory of the late-19th-century flax spinning mill once located here, the architectural company KPLN turns to the theme of textiles and weaving. The project’s main expressive device is a system of ribbons made of perforated weathering steel – a material that, in such volumes, has arguably not yet been used in Russian residential projects.
From Ski Resorts to Year-Round Recreation Clusters
In mid-December, several architectural firms gathered to discuss a “seasonal” topic: the prospects for the development of domestic ski tourism. Where is modern infrastructure already in place, where do only remnants of the Soviet legacy remain, and where is there still nothing – but projects are underway and soon to be completed? This article explores these questions.
Woven Into Sokolniki
Over the past few years, high-rise residential construction in former industrial zones has become the main theme of Moscow architecture. Towers are springing up here and there – but the question is what kind of towers they are. The residential complex CODE Sokolniki, designed by Ostozhenka Architects, is a project where every detail has been taken care of. The authors are attentive to the history of the site, the continuity of the urban fabric, the skyline, and visual corridors. They also proposed a motif with the lyrical name “scarf”. We take a closer look at the volumetric composition and the large-scale décor “woven”, in this case, out of terraces and balconies.
Stepan Liphart and Yuri Gerth: “Our Program Is Aesthetic”
The studio of Stepan Liphart, an architect known for his distinctive signature style and one-off projects, now has a partner. Yuri Khitrov, a specialist with a broad range of competencies, will take on the part of the work that distracts one from creativity but drives the business forward. One of the aims of this partnership is to improve the urban environment through dialogue with clients and officials. We spoke with both sides about their ambitions, the firm’s development strategy, shared values, and the need for pragmatism. And why the studio is called “Liphart & Gerth” only became clear at the very end of the interview.