По-русски

The Romance of a Saint Petersburg Courtyard

Studio 44’s approach to the redevelopment of the Liviz winery site appears to be an important precedent for Saint Petersburg: the architects are adapting not only designated heritage buildings but also other more-than-a-century old structures, revealing their distinctive character and giving them new public or residential uses. New architecture is interwoven with the old, creating a range of clearly defined or deliberately complex urban spaces. Blocks of different typologies are complemented by a pedestrian promenade that makes the environment much more permeable and lively. And all of this is framed by a sense of romance and nostalgia for the historic city.

01 September 2026
Object
mainImg

The industrial zone along the Sinopskaya Embankment is adjacent to the city’s administrative center – the Smolny Institute and the Nevskaya Ratusha – yet it remains a quintessential gray belt, where red-brick factory buildings are interspersed with Soviet-era workshops and 1990s warehouses. This “blank spot”, hidden from the city behind fences and security gates, will soon disappear: several sites have already acquired substantial redevelopment projects.

One such site is the complex of the “State Wine Warehouse”, built toward the end of the 19th century to a design by Alexander Ivanov, the architect of St. Petersburg’s numerous tenement buildings. After the Revolution, the enterprise was renamed the Leningrad Distillery Products Plant, abbreviated as “Liviz”. In 2007, production was moved to another site, and following the company’s bankruptcy, its assets were transferred to federal ownership.

The Liviz site is unusual and awkward. It occupies the center of a city block, has an irregular shape, and extends through narrow “arms” toward Moiseenko Street and Sinopskaya Embankment. It is surrounded on three sides by industrial areas: the former Thermal Power Plant No. 2, another major redevelopment project; the Izmeron plant, which moved its production to another site in 2023; and a less consolidated area where, behind the orderly row of tenement buildings that forms the embankment’s formal frontage, a labyrinth of structures from different periods has developed.

Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


The Liviz site contains two designated regional heritage buildings: the Main Production Building and the Spirit Warehouse. They are marked in bright red on the diagram below. The site also contains other century-old structures, shown in dark gray, including street-front buildings classified as valuable ordinary buildings, shown in light red. These buildings, which were remodeled and extended at a later date, will be cleared and adapted for new uses, according to the architects’ plan. Much information about them was found in a brochure published still back in 1889 to mark the opening of the plant: in addition to the master plan, the brochure contains drawings of the façades, interiors, and even the floor structures of the underground levels.

Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


However, the architects’ main goal was to transform the chaotic industrial site into a structured and comfortable environment, with a system of coherent blocks, streets, and courtyards.


Our underlying principle was to preserve everything that has at least some historical value. But there was no intention of returning to the 19th century: yes, we reveal the original characteristics of buildings that have been rebuilt three or four times, but by removing later additions, we introduce new ones that are more appropriate. As a result, we are creating a high-density urban block where historic and non-historic elements exist in harmonious unity. Such a dense yet romantic environment should attract people. By connecting Novgorodskaya Street and Sinopskaya Embankment, we are opening the block up to the city and creating what we call a ‘draw.’ The result is a fascinating space and a catalyst for the complete transformation of the area.


Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


To make this multifaceted project easier to describe and understand, let us begin with its “core” – the very “pull” Nikita Yavein refers to: a publicly accessible pedestrian promenade connecting Novgorodskaya Street and Sinopskaya Embankment. It is indeed essential to the site. At present, the “patch” of industrial development makes a 700-meter stretch of the embankment, miraculously inaccessible from the city.

The proposed promenade consists of two internal streets with distinct characters: a broad “shopping street” and a quieter, more leisurely “strolling street”. Historic buildings are located between them and will be assigned various public functions. For example, the former spirit warehouse will be converted into a bar and restaurant, with its interior built around the enormous metal tanks that have survived inside. Following restoration, the main factory building will be adapted into a wellness center with a swimming pool, bathhouses, and fitness facilities. The ground floors of other buildings facing the promenade will also be occupied by commercial spaces. Together, these elements will create a central public space that serves both local residents and the city as a whole.

Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


As the promenade runs from Novgorodskaya Street toward the embankment, its linearity is interrupted by towers. One of them, historically used for alcohol purification, partially blocks the “shopping street”, forcing it to bend into a meander. The tower will contain apartments, one per floor – a format of which there are only a handful in the city; the James Beck Manufaktura residential complex is perhaps the first example that comes to mind. A penthouse is being added on the roof, resembling almost a lantern room atop a lighthouse.

Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


A new tower is being built alongside the historic one, similar in scale and likewise containing a single apartment on each floor. Two more tower-like projections frame the volume of a historic building that is being restored and extended upward by three new floors. On the one hand, all these vertical elements make the spatial composition more complex, adding turns, setbacks, and changing perspectives. On the other, they create restrained rhythmic accents and help with wayfinding, marking important nodes such as squares and intersections.

Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


The central cluster with its towers, where historic, new, and hybrid buildings intertwine, creates that very romantic feeling of off-the-beaten-path St. Petersburg: an unpredictable, almost “enchanted” space that you plunge into from a busy street and, drawn in by curiosity, suddenly discover, in the second courtyard, a green oasis, a strangely shaped carriage house, or a record store with a jumble of books.

St. Petersburg’s courtyards are a special chapter in the city’s architecture, no less interesting than its grand ceremonial façades. In this project, we tried to create an intrablock space that is as complex and richly articulated as possible, with a new courtyard typology revealed around every corner. The irregular geometry of the site became a source for the development of asymmetrical, multilayered façade solutions, adding even more of that informal, off-the-beaten-path romance.


Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


The promenade reaches the embankment through two buildings classified as valuable ordinary ones. One of these buildings will be stripped of its later plaster, revealing the original 19th-century face brick beneath, and its existing additions will be replaced with more harmonious ones, with a lower cornice and a pitched roof. Both buildings will be adapted for residential use and connected by a new block with a “lookout tower”, whose windows will face the view toward the Neva. There is also a small but charming gatehouse, which will initially be adapted as a sales office and later, perhaps, as a shot bar. This way, the memory of the place is preserved while a local sociocultural phenomenon is given a chance to survive.

Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


Now let us move from the public part of the project to its semi-private and enclosed residential quarters. New buildings are being constructed to the north and south of the promenade, complementing the historic fabric and, to varying degrees, continuing the factory’s original planning structure, where two planning systems intersect – those of Sinopskaya Embankment and Moiseenko Street. The architecture follows the character of the historic brick buildings while carefully introducing contemporary techniques and materials: three-dimensional masonry, metal mansard floors, transparent canopies, and an irregular rhythm of windows.

In the southern part, the new buildings form a “dotted” line of sections of varying heights, defining the boundary of a quieter pedestrian street. In the previously mentioned building with tower-like risalits, a kindergarten is located on the courtyard side, sharing a large playground with two flanking residential buildings. Closer to the embankment, a hotel is being built.

To the north of the promenade, opposite the tower cluster, the planning grid becomes more orthogonal. Here, two semi-enclosed blocks are arranged around a system of three courtyard wells, though these courtyards are more spacious than those in the historic center. On the promenade side, the blocks are terminated by lower buildings, opening up picturesque, “irregular” views.

Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


Moving a little farther away from the promenade, we come to the “arm” on the Moiseenko Street side. Here, another building typology is proposed: a building with a long cour d’honneur and a high arch at the center of its “front” building. On the outside, the building’s “wings” smooth out the bends in the red-line boundaries between the neighboring sites, creating a picturesque, jagged “edge”. This part of the complex contains the entrance to a two-level underground parking garage.

Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


  • zooming
    1 / 4
    Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
    Copyright: © Studio 44
  • zooming
    2 / 4
    Plan of the 1st floor. Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
    Copyright: © Studio 44
  • zooming
    3 / 4
    Plan of the 2nd floor. Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
    Copyright: © Studio 44
  • zooming
    4 / 4
    Plan of the 3rd (standard) floor. Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
    Copyright: © Studio 44


This functionally and typologically rich environment, seemingly unlike anything else in the city, is assembled from urban-planning “morphemes” characteristic of St. Petersburg: Liviz has a commercial street and a pedestrian street, squares of different scales, towers and turrets, linear buildings, classic enclosed courtyards, cour d’honneurs, and arches. The architects were even unafraid to draw a puddle in the rendering – an inescapable feature of the capital of rain.

Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site
Copyright: © Studio 44


The density, which some might regard as a drawback of the project, provided it with the necessary square footage and thus made it possible to vary the scale and building heights, rather than bringing the entire development up to the maximum permitted limits. The integration into the project of not only designated heritage buildings but also other pre-Revolutionary structures has added a wealth of remarkable qualities: layers of history, a diversity of forms and materials, and a sense of continuity and connection with the city.

Residential complex on Sinopskaya Embankment: redevelopment of the Liviz factory site


In describing the project, the architects repeatedly returned to the word “romance”. It is not a word one often hears in the context of a major commercial project, where profit is the ultimate measure of everything. And these are difficult times – there is little room for lofty dreams; one has to be tough and strong.

Yet perhaps this is precisely the term that contemporary St. Petersburg architecture is missing, and it could serve as a vector for its possible development. How many new neighborhoods can be called romantic? The point, of course, is not prettiness or views of the sunset, but rather the presence of reflection and the alleviation of a longing for an “ideal” historic city.

Incidentally, Studio 44 has been moving in the direction of romanticism for quite some time. Take, for example, the Tuchkov Buyan Park project, where “the emphasis is shifted from the wow effect of an attraction to the modeling and activation of real sensations”. What could be a better response to Moscow’s “emotional architecture”?

01 September 2026

Headlines now
The Romance of a Saint Petersburg Courtyard
Studio 44’s approach to the redevelopment of the Liviz winery site appears to be an important precedent for Saint Petersburg: the architects are adapting not only designated heritage buildings but also other more-than-a-century old structures, revealing their distinctive character and giving them new public or residential uses. New architecture is interwoven with the old, creating a range of clearly defined or deliberately complex urban spaces. Blocks of different typologies are complemented by a pedestrian promenade that makes the environment much more permeable and lively. And all of this is framed by a sense of romance and nostalgia for the historic city.
The Voice of the Amur
MV-PROJECT has won a competition for the façades of the Khabarovsk Regional Academic Musical Theater. The architects took a bold approach, proposing a striking wave-like envelope inspired by the waters of the Amur, along with landscaped rooftop terraces. The concept won an absolute majority of the public vote. We take a closer look at the proposal, its feasibility, and its rich imagery, which invites associations with the work of Ivan Aivazovsky and Katsushika Hokusai.
A Theater for Figure Skaters, or Cherchez La Femme
Ice arenas are typologically close to industrial buildings: enormous windowless halls with minimal architectural embellishment. In designing Navka Arena, Yuliy Borisov and the UNK architects did not try to fight the utilitarian nature of the structure. Instead, they concentrated all of its expressive elements in one place – the central façade. A parabolic canopy, a monumental sculpture of a figure skater, and her shadow rendered in perforated metal transform an ordinary sports “box” into an architectural statement about ice, movement, and theater.
The Soft Forms of a New Enlightenment
The school that will rise amid the new high-rise neighborhoods of Set and Veer can fairly be called a landmark of the future district. The educational environment was designed by IMAGO, a firm specializing in learning spaces, while the façade concept was selected through a competition. The winner, GAFA, proposed a regular grid of three-dimensional modules that creates an intriguing effect of “soft” architecture. The imagery of this solution appeals to children of different ages and suits the stature of the educational complex, which will be handed over to the highly rated School No. 1329 upon completion.
Projection of a Spiral, Projection of a Wave
Architects from Mezonsproekt have designed a high-rise residential complex of four towers near the intersection of Novaya Riga Highway and the Moskva River. Its landmark status is motivated both by the proximity of Rublyovo-Arkhangelskoye and its SberCity development, and by the theme of two intersecting flows: water and traffic. The architects have organized the façade pattern around the supergraphic image of a pixelated spiral, intended to animate – and perhaps even transform – the perception of the buildings’ prismatic volumes.
​The Ever-Changing Mist
T+T Architects has developed a concept for a premium business center featuring “living” façades that change their configuration depending on weather conditions, time of day, and the occupants’ needs, transforming the building into an urban-scale installation. The idea of endless variability continues inside, with interiors designed to accommodate different scenarios of use. Some of the engineering solutions proposed for the project are being introduced to the Russian commercial real estate market for the first time.
​A Small Book of Farewell
The book dedicated to Valery Kanyashin, published by his colleagues at Ostozhenka Architects, is remarkably small. It fits comfortably in the palm of your hand, more like sketchbook than an actual architectural monograph. Combined with its tiny print run, the result is an intentionally unglamorous, decidedly non-representational publication – one that is made “for friends”. Yet the way it weaves together projects, texts, photographs, and drawings is remarkably subtle. Perhaps this is precisely how one comes to understand a person, at least a little, by tracing the course of their creative life.
Win-Win
For Perm, the opening of the new home for its Art Gallery – guardian of the famous collection of Perm wooden sculpture – marks the end of a 35-year search for a building worthy of a collection that had long outgrown the city cathedral that had served as its only home. Sergey Tchoban considers the project one of the most important of his career in Russia and emphasizes that it deliberately avoids “iconic” architecture in favor of contextual appropriateness. We traveled to Perm to explore both the building and its extensive new exhibition, and found that, much like Tchoban’s other museum projects, it is conceived in a distinctly contemporary way: the old and the new do not merely coexist but reinforce one another through contrast, sharpening the visitor’s perception of the museum.
A Score for 12th Line
“Amo”, a residential complex designed by Stepan Liphart on Vasilyevsky Island, brings together three architectural ideas: the cour d’honneur, a piazzetta-like courtyard, and imagery borrowed from Renaissance architecture. Together, these elements make a contemporary apartment complex feel more humane, extending the theme of individuality in residential design. The effect is achieved through a carefully calibrated vocabulary of moderately standardized components: recessed façade panels enriched with sgraffito ornament, a disciplined hierarchy of cornices and moldings, and a series of bespoke decorative details. The development combines residential and hotel sections that frame the restored wooden mansion of the Brömme brothers.
Riverfront Façade
The Premium residential complex, designed by KPLN, has been built in the town of Pushkino, just outside Moscow, on the banks of the Serebryanka River. Its two towers reinforce the scale of the high-rise development that emerged here in the 2000s, while introducing a bolder architectural form that reads more effectively from a distance, along with a system of contrasts and design strategies responding to the site’s waterfront setting. One of the project’s distinctive features is a series of metal discs that conceal air-conditioning units while serving as an additional decorative layer.
A Construction Set for Adult Life
In the project by Atrium, the new building for Moscow’s School No. 2107, designed to accommodate 1,100 students, is above all a carefully organized system of learning and recreational spaces. On the one hand, it is complex and highly articulated; on the other, it remains intuitive, safe, and conducive to personal growth. In a sense, it serves as a model of life in the city – a place where one must communicate, make decisions, plan ahead, and find a balance between work and leisure. All of these scenarios are reflected, to varying degrees, in the building’s architecture.
Axis of Rotation
One of the installations in the Masters exhibition at Arch Moscow featured a futuristic yet entirely feasible project by Vladimir Plotkin and TPO Reserve – a tower that could be assembled from prefabricated factory-made modules. The concept even incorporates the possibility of slow rotation (!). Using the same module, one could create a residential block, a giant cantilevered “arrow”, or virtually any other configuration you could possibly think of. Let us take a closer look at the module itself.
A New Magazine and a New Ranking
The magazine Expert.Urban has only just appeared, apparently timed to coincide with Arch Moscow. It is published with the support of VEB.RF and Strelka KB. We have not yet had time to read it cover to cover, but the impression so far is that it consists of about eighty percent interviews. It also features a distinctly “Strelka-style” initiative: a ranking of the “Best Architect of Moscow in the 21st Century”. So, who came out on top? Sergey Skuratov. Yuri Grigoryan took second place, and Sergei Tchoban came third.
Oleg Shapiro: “We design life as a whole, in all of its diversity”
Wowhaus has long since outgrown its association with “urban improvement” projects alone. One of its newer directions is neo-industrialization. Another is large-scale master planning. Yet work on Gorky Park is once again underway – only now on a more systematic and far-reaching level. In this interview, we simultaneously revisit Rem Koolhaas, Strelka, and the history of attention to the “urban environment”, while also exploring what exactly Wowhaus is working on today and how the company operates – with its nine divisions and approximately 160 employees.
Red Card for Copyright
The development concept for the territory of Shinnik Stadium in Yaroslavl, prepared by PI ARENA, took second place in an open call competition. The architects proposed a unified structure combining a football arena, a hotel, and the headquarters of PSB Bank, with carefully considered usage scenarios. However, the competition was organized in such a way that the team ultimately chose to forgo the prize money in order to retain their copyright.
CinemaHologram
Not long ago, the Moscow authorities approved the project for a new House of Cinema complex by Kleinewelt Architekten. The original 1968 building could not be preserved – yet the architects managed to save its stained-glass panels, metal reliefs, and even the volumetric parameters of the structure, which will continue to house the Union of Cinematographers and cinema halls. The project’s main focal point, however, will be a residential tower. We examine its sculptural qualities and its allusions within the Moscow context.
Form as Method: TPO Reserve
At the core of the concept developed by Vladimir Plotkin and TPO Reserve lies an unconventional morphology that addresses functional challenges beyond purely formal concerns. Above all, however, it serves expressiveness and creates a rare kind of spatial and emotional experience, as becomes evident when examining the project’s key solutions. We studied it in detail, and it was all worth it. Our interpretation is that what drives this project is neither style nor even metaphor, but rather a method.
Mound of Memory
The competition proposal for a memorial complex on the Pulkovo Heights by Studio 44 will not be realized, yet it deserves attention as an intriguing example of how architecture can symbolize traumatic events and thereby contribute to their processing and integration into human experience. The architects also succeed in combining memorial and recreational functions without slipping either into excessive dramatization or oversimplification. The project develops ideas explored in two earlier competition entries that likewise remained unbuilt – the Museum of the Siege of Leningrad and the Tuchkov Buyan park. It also recalls the mound-like hill that Alexander Nikolsky embodied in the form of the now-lost stadium on Krestovsky Island.
Home Base
Working on the new building for Letovo Junior School – opened to students in autumn 2025 in the MSU Valley – the architects of UNK, following the client’s vision, subordinated both façades and interiors to the theme of “home”. Multiple variations of pitched roofs, a city skyline traced across glass balustrades, wooden textures, and a whole series of micro-spaces for retreat within public areas are all at the disposal of primary and middle school students. We take a closer look at the new school building – and at how it interprets current trends in educational environments.
Doubles Match
The architecture of the Tennis Palace built in Luzhniki Olympic Complex, designed by Arena Design Institute, was shaped by three factors: the proximity of the brutalist Druzhba Arena, the closeness of the Moskva River and the metro bridge overpass, as well as the specifics of the function – tennis courts require large spans, abundant light, yet at the same time protection from direct sunlight. The architects divided the building into several blocks, playing on contrast, which is further emphasized by the façades developed in collaboration with TPO Reserve and Vladimir Plotkin.
Microdynamics of Macroprocesses
Given the proximity of the multifunctional complex SOLOS to Sokolniki Park and to a major transport hub, Kleinewelt Architekten embedded in the design of the two high-rise towers a sense of dynamism more characteristic of natural phenomena than of man-made objects. Without the authors’ diagrams, this logic is not easy to decipher, although the eye immediately detects a pattern and tries to grasp it. It seems to us that one tower contains the impulse of a bud about to open, while the other evokes the movement of a lithospheric plate. Let us try to unravel it together.
The Space of Post-Cubism
Sergei Tchoban and Alexandra Sheiner, of Studio CHART, created for the exhibition of “post-cubist” sculpture by Beatrice Sandomirskaya – a talented and even “mainstream” artist, yet almost unknown even to art historians – a space akin to her sculptural language: solidly built, confidently stereometric, and subtly expressive. It curves, emphasizing the mass of the sculpture, envelops the viewer, and guides them from one perspective to another, from a generic “shrine” to a “Madonna”.
The Value of Open Space
For the site near the Barrikadnaya Metro Station, Sergey Skuratov developed five projects between 2020 and 2025. Two of them were ones that won the client’s invitation-only competitions. The fifth was recently selected by the Mayor of Moscow for implementation. The project is vivid and sculptural, expressive, eye-catching, and engaging – very much in line with the spirit of our time. And yet, this project is mid-rise rather than tall. In its northwestern part, near the metro and Druzhinnikovskaya Street, it shapes a comfortable urban environment. On the opposite side, it opens up, allowing sunlight into the courtyard and creating a spatial pause within the dense city fabric. How it is organized, what geometric principles underlie it, and why it takes this form – all this is explored in our article.
Coming From the Cold
The ArchBukhta Festival remains one of the few events in Russia where participants go through the entire process of creating an architectural object – from concept to construction. And they do so on the shores of Lake Baikal, in dedication to it. This year, GAFA took part and shared its experience: a local legend, a team-specific design code, friendship, as well as ice skating and endurance in freezing temperatures all contributed to gaining something more than just an award.
Symphony of Water and Brick
The Alter residential complex, designed by Stepan Liphart and built on a bend of the Okhta River, is an example of a “drawn house”: the number of original architectural details is virtually immeasurable. As a result, ribs, projections, and recesses create a picturesque silhouette even without a significant variation in height. Both composition and material respond to the proximity of the river and to the red-brick factory building dating back to the early 20th century. The project was also significantly shaped by recommendations from the city’s chief architect. More details in our article.
The Penguin House
The building with a curved façade on Brestskaya Street is one of the manifestos of Russian neomodernism of the early 2000s, a sculpture – this is how Anatoly Belov interprets it, speaking of “breaking from the modernist canon and the contextual approach”. We do not fully agree with the author, but his perspective is an interesting one.
Wave and Vertical
The premium residential complex designed by GAFA for a site in the Khoroshevsky District responds to multiple constraints – the arc of a planned roadway, the water protection zone of the Khodynka River, and insolation requirements – through inventive massing. The composition is built on the interplay of two spatial layers: an elongated perimeter block and three towers concealed behind it generate the silhouette and key viewpoints, while also adding semantic depth reinforced by the façade solutions. Another defining feature is a large private courtyard, complemented by a citywide linear park.
Office on Trubnaya
We continue publishing projects by Valery Kanyashin. A building once described, a quarter century ago, as an example of “quiet modernism” has remained just that in some people’s memory. According to Anatoly Belov, its main quality is its unobtrusiveness. The architects from Ostozhenka say the leading role here is played by context and landscape – the change in elevation. Yet is it really so inconspicuous?
The First International
With this publication, we begin a series of texts dedicated to works by the late Valery Kanyashin, one of the founders of Ostozhenka Architects. As it happens, the projects he was involved in largely illustrate our understanding of the firm and its history. The first project in this series is the International Moscow Bank on Prechistenskaya Embankment.
In Memory of Valery Kanyashin
On Friday, February 27, architect Valery Kanyashin passed away – co-founder of Ostozhenka Architects and the author of many significant buildings in Moscow. We publish a text by Anatoly Belov in memory of Valery Kanyashin.