Genplan Institute of Moscow

Genplan Institute of Moscow:

Back to Firm’s Profile

From Ski Resorts to Year-Round Recreation Clusters
30.01.2026

From Ski Resorts to Year-Round Recreation Clusters

In mid-December, several architectural firms gathered to discuss a “seasonal” topic: the prospects for the development of domestic ski tourism. Where is modern infrastructure already in place, where do only remnants of the Soviet legacy remain, and where is there still nothing – but projects are underway and soon to be completed? This article explores these questions.
Mountains, Groves, and Ancestral Towers
15.12.2025

Alyona Kuznetsova. Mountains, Groves, and Ancestral Towers

The year-round mountain resort Armkhi situated in Russia’s Republic of Ingushetia is positioned as a destination for calm family recreation and has well-established traditions shaped by its hundred-year history and the culture of the region. The development program prepared by the Genplan Institute of Moscow preserves the resort’s identity while expanding its offerings and introducing new types of tourist leisure. In the near future, the resort will feature a balneological center, a thermal complex, an interactive museum, an extreme park, and, of course, new ski slopes.
A Satellite Island
09.12.2025

Alyona Kuznetsova. A Satellite Island

The Genplan Institute of Moscow has prepared a master plan for the development of the Sarpinsky and Golodny island system, located within the administrative boundaries of Volgograd and considered among the largest river islands in Russia. By 2045, the plan envisions the implementation of 15 large-scale investment projects, including sports and educational clusters, a congress center with a “Volgonarium”, a film production cluster, and twenty-one theme parks. We explain which engineering, environmental, and transportation challenges must be addressed to turn this vision into reality. The master plan solutions have already been approved and incorporated into the city’s general development plan.
Peaks of Ossetia
10.11.2025

Alyona Kuznetsova. Peaks of Ossetia

In North Ossetia, a new year-round tourist and recreational cluster, “Mamison”, is being built from scratch – its first section of cable car and ski slopes has already been launched. The comprehensive development plan for this territory was prepared by the Institute for the General Plan of Moscow: in the future, two tourist villages will appear here, along with slopes of varying difficulty, health resorts, and routes that will allow the visitors to explore the region’s historical and cultural heritage in greater depth.
Ancient City, Yet Still Somewhat Neglected
02.09.2025

Julia Tarabarina. Ancient City, Yet Still Somewhat Neglected

The town of Kasimov in the Ryazan Region is Russian-Tatar in character – until as late as 1681 (!) it was the center of a Khanate, albeit under the overall authority of Moscow princes. Today, it is a small tourist town with architectural monuments dating from the 16th-18th centuries and later. The task of the Genplan Institute of Moscow’s summer workshop was to propose interventions for Kasimov that could increase tourist flow while also benefiting local residents. The result was a wide range of ideas – from pedestrian routes to relocating the bus station.
Greater Altai: A Systemic Development Plan
15.05.2025

Dmitry Leonov. Greater Altai: A Systemic Development Plan

The master plan for tourism development in Greater Altai encompasses three regions: Kuzbass, the Altai Republic, and Altai Krai. It is one of twelve projects developed as part of the large-scale state program bearing the simple name of “Tourism Development”. The project’s slogan reads: “Greater Altai – a place of strength, health, and spirit in the very heart of Siberia”. What are the proposed growth points, and how will the plan help increase the flow of both domestic and international tourists? Read on to find out.
Elevation 5642
04.03.2025

Alyona Kuznetsova. Elevation 5642

The Genplan Institute of Moscow has developed a comprehensive development project for three ski resorts in the Caucasus, which have been designated as special economic zones of the tourism and recreation type. The first of these zones is Elbrus. The project includes the construction of new ski runs, cable cars, and hotels, as well as the modernization of stations and improvements to the Azau tourist meadow. To expand the audience and enhance year-round appeal, a network of eco-trails is also being developed. In this article, we provide a detailed breakdown of each stage.
A Paper Clip above the River
24.12.2024

Julia Tarabarina. A Paper Clip above the River

In this article, we talk with Vitaly Lutz from the Genplan Institute of Moscow about the design and unique features of the pedestrian bridge that now links the two banks of the Yauza River in the new cluster of Bauman Moscow State Technical University (MSTU). The bridge’s form and functionality – particularly the inclusion of an amphitheater suspended over the river – were conceived during the planning phase of the territory’s development. Typically, this approach is not standard practice, but the architects advocate for it, referring to this intermediate project phase as the “pre-AGR” stage (AGR stands for Architectural and Urban Planning Approval). Such a practice, they argue, helps define key parameters of future projects and bridge the gap between urban planning and architectural design.
Competition: The Price of Creativity?
16.12.2024

Julia Tarabarina. Competition: The Price of Creativity?

Any day now, we’re expecting the results of a competition held by the “Samolet” development group for a plot in Kommunarka. In the meantime, we share the impressions of Editor-in-Chief Julia Tarabarina, who managed to conduct a public talk. Though technically focused on the interaction between developers and architects, the public talk turned into a discussion about the pros and cons of architectural competitions.
Four Different Surveys
25.11.2024

Julia Tarabarina. Four Different Surveys

The “Explore the City” competition, organized this year by the Genplan Institute of Moscow, stands out as a pretty unconventional one for the architectural field but aligns perfectly well with the character of urban planning work. The winning project analyzed contemporary residential complexes, combining urban planning insights with a realtor’s perspective to propose a hybrid approach. Other entries explored public centers, motivations for car ownership, and housing vacancy rates. A fifth participant withdrew. Here’s a closer look at the four completed works.
earlier

Partner Architects of Archi.ru:

  • Konstantin Khodnev
  • Andy Snow
  • Oleg Medinsky
  • Sergey Skuratov
  • Stanislav Belykh
  • Andrey Asadov
  • Sergey  Trukhanov
  • Andrey Gnezdilov
  • Rostislav Zaiser
  • Vsevolod Medvedev
  • Andrey Romanov
  • Sergei Tchoban
  • Natalia Shilova
  • Igor  Shvartsman
  • Anton Nadtochiy
  • Valery  Kanyashin
  • Rais Baishev
  • Nikita Yavein
  • Julia  Tryaskina
  • Daniel  Lorenz
  • Vassily Krapivin
  • Zurab Bassaria
  • Yuliy Borisov
  • Georgy Trofimov
  • Oleg Shapiro
  • Ekaterina Kuznetsova
  • Dmitry Likin
  • Dmitry Ostroumov
  • Mikhail Kanunnikov
  • Alexander Skokan
  • Vera Butko
  • Alexandra Kuzmina
  • Ilia Mashkov
  • Sergey Kouznetsov
  • Vladimir Plotkin
  • Pavel Andreev
  • Tatiana Zulkharneeva
  • Natalia Sidorova
  • Sergey Pereslegin
  • Alexander Asadov
  • Alexandr Samarin
  • Polina Voevodina
  • Nikolay Pereslegin

Buildings and Projects: New Additions

  • Competition for the coastal quarters of the ALIA district
  • Private house
  • Naberezhnaya Evropy, St. Petersburg
  • Pavilion for Chacha Ceremonies
  • “Replacement” Project
  • Residential complex
  • “Olympic Hall”Business Center
  • Residential complex
  • Residential complex ′Andersen′